The sentence from rP6911 should be updated to reflect that we ought to have most licensing information by now.
The pathnames look like unix format, but they aren't, since paths starting with / are considered absolute.
Details
Details
Check whether the first sentence of the document shouldn't be more conditional, as one can't generalize GPL v2+ features for the entire package.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP 0 A.D. Public Repository
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Event Timeline
| LICENSE.txt | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ↗ | (On Diff #6964) | Doesn't this imply that the code is also under the LICENSE.txt, or is that covered by L17? |
| LICENSE.txt | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ↗ | (On Diff #6964) | Doesn't LICENSE.txt of that directoy explain the licensing within that directory? |
| LICENSE.txt | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ↗ | (On Diff #6964) | Apparently so. The other directories are still kinda grey though, aren't they? |