Suggests.
getUserConfigBool, getUserConfigString, getUserConfigNumber(name)
replaces
Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name) !/===/== "true" Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name) +Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name)
Differential D1216
Get User Config Setting getUserConfigBool, getUserConfigString, getUserConfigNumber ffffffff on Jan 11 2018, 2:33 PM. Authored by Tags None Subscribers None
Details
Suggests. getUserConfigBool, getUserConfigString, getUserConfigNumber(name) replaces Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name) !/===/== "true" Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name) +Engine.ConfigDB_GetValue("user", name) test
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Comment Actions It would be the getter pendant to the setter proposed in D1211. But the names should be really well chosen if so. Also if we add a getter, we might want to add different getters, one for boolean values, one for numbers and one for strings. Maybe. Comment Actions getter
Comment Actions can we finally commit that and overtake it into code so i don't have to rebase it all the time because it's coming new engine getValues calls in the code??
|