Page MenuHomeWildfire Games

Don't use relative templates in some templates until they are supported.
AbandonedPublic

Authored by fatherbushido on May 7 2017, 8:40 AM.

Details

Reviewers
elexis
Summary

As described in the title

Test Plan

Run the related script in source/tools/entity (after generating the rng for the public mod).
perl -I ~/0adfolder/source/tools/entity entvalidate.pl

Diff Detail

Repository
rP 0 A.D. Public Repository
Branch
/ps/trunk
Lint
Lint OK
Unit
No Unit Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 1500
Build 2368: Vulcan BuildJenkins
Build 2367: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

fatherbushido created this revision.May 7 2017, 8:40 AM
Vulcan added a subscriber: Vulcan.May 7 2017, 9:33 AM

Build is green

Updating workspaces.
Build (release)...
Build (debug)...
Running release tests...
Running cxxtest tests (306 tests)..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................OK!
Running debug tests...
Running cxxtest tests (306 tests)..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................OK!

http://jw:8080/job/phabricator/1043/ for more details.

elexis retitled this revision from Don't use relative templates in some templates until they are not supported. to Don't use relative templates in some templates until they are supported..May 7 2017, 2:34 PM

ah yes, I messed the title :p

or wait for D268 (in both case we should edit those templates)

fatherbushido abandoned this revision.May 29 2017, 8:39 PM

As they validate (by chance) and that only the perl script entvalidate doesn' t validate, perhaps it's not the good thing to revert that and redo that when it will be fully handle (there is also Cost). So I prefer abandon that.