@vladislavbelov does this still waiting for https://code.wildfiregames.com/D3040? or are there some other limitations?

Just found this nice post about MSAA that might come in handy here @vladislavbelov https://mynameismjp.wordpress.com/2012/10/24/msaa-overview/

@Stan polite ping, any update on this?

Any update @Imarok ?

In D2972#129770, @myou5e wrote:

Yes, this is a good idea. Alternately use "a secondary attack" such as using the pike as a "lever" ;-)
Subtly implying I really want to see many attacks available ;-)

In D2936#129095, @Stan wrote:

Not worth it anymore.

@vladislavbelov would you commandeer it in near future or is it obsolete by now?

In D2723#128335, @snokis wrote:

In D2723#126380, @Stan wrote:

Hey, any news?

Yep, soon.. Sorry, started working again, lost interest and then went off-grid for a few weeks :) Is this something you want for the next release?

I hopefully added correct guys.

Thank you so much for your hard work.

@wraitii @Stan can you help?

In D2852#126518, @borg- wrote:

Can change author patch?

No objection if it gets committed.

Alright then.

I think this is nice change and since above people also agree, I agree too but maybe more noble would be to in warning write that they need drivers with some version of graphics library and other supported shader pipelines. I cannot comment on code though.

Thanks for your patch

@Stan @wraitii i believe this is needed for https://wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?/topic/28462-spec-mod/page/2/&tab=comments#comment-401507

@Freagarach @Angen any interest in this?

@wraitii any chance you can look at it?

In rP23859#43410, @vladislavbelov wrote:

In rP23859#43398, @asterix wrote:

It did not close https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/1109

It's strange, maybe I missed something. Thank you!

It did not close https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/1109

@wraitii I believe you forgot to close https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/4332

Does @Bellaz89 run into similar issue? I believe sometime back something was discussed in irc.

In D2683#123734, @Nescio wrote:

Actually the Persian chariot is not used in any maps.
Mauryas and Seleucids have champion chariots too, but those are trainable, as is the Briton chariot javelineer. As for cost vs benefit, see D2816, but that's beyond the scope of this patch. Ideally I'd like to see Carthage and Kush get chariots too, but those require new actors.
A more interesting question is where chariots ought to be trainable, fortress, stable, or workshop.

In D2815#123710, @Stan wrote:

I wonder if we should have a simpler 'two guys and a log' variant of rams.

There is one somewhere, dunno if it was committed.

Welcome improvement.

Here is how it was done for other OS platforms in blender https://developer.blender.org/T77010 from sdl 2.0.8 to 2.0.12

that depends on @vladislavbelov

@vladislavbelov this patch is not tested, yet? maybe @Imarok @wraitii and @gameboy might help. btw i am talking about minimap expand https://wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?/topic/24649-autociv-mod-0ad-enhancer/page/4/ from @nani mod.

Thank you @wraitii this patch will be a big help for casual and mp players especially if the keys could rebindable as well since mac users have problems with mouse or custom made keyboards. I am on windows 10 64 bit btw.

@wraitii it is related to this https://wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?/topic/28059-svn-public-alpha-24-version-on-macos-ui-problem/&tab=comments#comment-395402

I agree with this change, even if we will not implement all of this we can nuke them out case by case.

duplicate of https://code.wildfiregames.com/D1587

refs this ticket I believe https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/5011

Thank you for your first patch do not forget to add yourself to programming.json , I am adding elexis and fexor since they did and do map development.

Do to recent comment https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/3190#comment:13 I suggest @Itms after this is commited to upgrade it straight to recent versions as done https://github.com/s0600204/0ad/tree/fmt .

In rP23459#41296, @vladislavbelov wrote:

In rP23459#41294, @asterix wrote:

@vladislavbelov You forgot to close https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/3920

Nope, I mentioned in the original patch, that the ticket isn't directly related to build snapping. In my patch it is an edge snapping, in the ticket it is a grid snapping.

@vladislavbelov You forgot to close https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/3920

This would be a nice addition. @vladislavbelov have you looked at @nani s mod? Autociv recent version has enlarging minimap that would be a useful addition too.

In D2500#105009, @Stan wrote:

I fail to see the real use of it but it could be nice to have dunno. One could use that to script camera actions maybe.

The switch between camera is broken though it should at best copy the current camera position.

IDEA: Since it's a special camera maybe it would be nice to have an indication it's being used such as text on the interface?

Thank you much for this patch. I suspect Adrian that you will further update it until recent release (especially those optimizations)?

In D2483#105386, @Angen wrote:

Thats not me it is refactor of original version done by @s0600204

Thank you so much that you working on this, as I understand, it is an insane undertaking but well documented one. In Chapter 13 I agree with your A approach and in Chapter 14 I agree that skirmish map type will likely be obsoleted. Moreover, since you deal with game setup rewrite here could you also include civ select. screen during match setup originally from @Angen https://github.com/JustusAvramenko/delenda_est/commit/bd1e73bf133674e790aa9f686f4b41e2ccba0a43 as it is used in not yet released Delenda Est mod, released Battalion mod and recently released Hyrule Conquest mod. Btw will you be also rewriting the GUI code that is present during playing game (match)?

After the rebase now It can be committed.

@historic_bruno you should look at https://code.wildfiregames.com/D2030 as well.

Thank you for working on this @vladislavbelov .

It shows, what it should show while looking at the code I see no problems. Tested on Windows 10 64 bit.

@wraitii would you be working on this since Stan told me that it is quite slow and needs to be optimized that is one of the reasons it was not accepted yet.

Wording and grammar are correct, it looks immediately commitable to me.

Thank you for your first contribution. Looks simple enough. I added respective guys that are knowledgeable in this area, of course, they can resign from this revision proposal. Please also keep in mind the advice that Stan gave you. Update dates please in those files.

Please look at comments from Stan, me and others.

I believe it is mainly https://wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?/topic/25031-task-0-ad-ships-update/&page=8&tab=comments#comment-369648

The text is correct. Thank you for the corrections.

very nice could you also take some screenshots as previously showcasing uses?

@nani could you make it official proposal (diff) ?

hmm... the picture looks nice, the white on black has a nice contrast that does not hurt eyes. Btw why do you not want to remain mod.io privacy policy as a name that could be clicked upon rather than straight having the URL shown?

Thank you smiley for taking your time and working on this. Btw there also seems to be some incomplete support for formats as said here https://trac.wildfiregames.com/ticket/2828 (last two comments from elexis).

I agree with Stan that it could be moved to art repo and with Smiley in a sense that it is unused.

This proposal makes sense so I accept, however, there might be in campaigns or Hyrule Conquest mod or other similar mod a problem with a variety of combinations of unusual characters and their behavior.

Nice diff thank you (http://irclogs.wildfiregames.com/2018-09/2018-09-28-QuakeNet-%230ad-dev.log)

This is definitely what is needed and it is not just GDPR but some other countries in the world have harsh policies on this subject e.g. in my country it will fall into a gray area (law) where judges look at it negatively when some agreements are not translated.

In D274#60601, @wraitii wrote:

Eagles's 1976 classic 'You can checkout any time you want, but you can never commit'

In D281#60602, @wraitii wrote:

This is one I'd like some kind of comment on. Do people like the idea? Hate it?

In D825#54180, @vladislavbelov wrote:

In D825#54178, @asterix wrote:

Any news on this project?

I think, I should test it again. And then commit, if there won't be a problem.

Any news on this project?

That is a good idea what elexis said. Also please look at https://wildfiregames.com/forum/index.php?/topic/24027-viewer/&tab=comments#comment-348921 if you have not already and thank you for working on it.

Thanks

I also noticed the thing and therefore agree with the change.